Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Should I Upgrade to Windows Vista?

I have been asked by quite a few people lately if I thought it was a good idea to upgrade their computer systems to Windows Vista. My thoughts on the subject:

Windows Vista is the newest major operating system release from Microsoft. The last major release was Windows XP in October 2001. Before that was Windows 98 in June (surprise) 1998. So they do not release these things too often. So, if you run Windows, you will probably end up running Vista sooner or later (you buy a new computer, a new piece of hardware or software requires it, etc.).

So my two assumptions are that that Vista will be the primary operating system for computers for the next 4-6 years and that eventually you will be running Vista. So, why not start now and get the benefits of the whole life span of Microsoft's next gen OS?

So now that you have decided to run Vista, the next question is, should I upgrade my computer or should I buy a new one with Vista pre-installed?

My advice to people with computers more than a year old... buy a new computer with Vista pre-installed. If you try and upgrade your older computer it will probably go something like this:
  1. Buy Windows Vista ($100-$260) depending on the version (more on this later)
  2. Upgrade video card to support Vista ($89-$250)
  3. Upgrade RAM and/or hard drive to support Vista ($50-$150)
  4. One year later: Encounter some kind of problem due to old hardware, old software, etc.
  5. Decide to buy a new computer with Vista pre-installed
Sure, if your existing computer is working flawlessly and you have no problems or concerns in the world, there is nothing wrong with waiting to get a new computer, but you don't need to upgrade either. That would be a waste of time and money.

If, however, your computer is less than a year old (or you have a powerhouse from a little over a year ago), then run the Microsoft Upgrade Advisor and see what you will need to do to your computer to get it ready to run Vista. Chances are you will not need to change much (maybe you will need to swap out the video card).

Oh, and as some people have noticed, there are quite a few versions of the new Vista OS, for most standard home users, I would suggest Home Premium (upgrade: $159).

Friday, January 19, 2007

Lost in Translation

So when I was in Mexico a while back, I was looking at the DVDs on sale at the grocery store and I noticed Sofia Coppola's movie, Lost in Translation. However, since I was in Mexico the title was in Spanish, Perdidos en Tokio. Wait a second, that translates to Lost in Tokyo.

Maybe it is just me, but I find the fact that the title of the movie Lost in Translation was actually lost in translation. I suppose you could say that Ms. Coppola asked for it?

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Ladies and gentlemen, the Human Sling Shot

I don't know why, but this video just cracked me up...

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

I'm the lead writer of my blog, baby!

So when I was trying to come up for a name for my blog I considered all the options... OK, so really all that I could think of was "Trevor's Blog" and "You Wanna Know What I Think?" Obviously, the latter won out... The title was actually favored to win all along, namely because it was the title of my column when I was the Editor for my high school's student paper.

As easy as it was for me to come up with a blog title, it was a bit more challenging to find a suitable URL for my blog. You see, http://trevor.blogspot.com was already taken, as were most other variations on my name. And, although http://youwannaknowwhatithink.blogspot.com was available, it seemed a bit too long.

So I decided to get clever (where my logic normally diverges from the rest of the world's) and I thought about what would most people first think when I asked them the question, "You wanna know what I think?"

"Not really, Trevor"

Thus my blog's URL was born, http://notreallytrevor.blogspot.com.

(This posting was written in order to explain where the "not really Trevor" came from and possibly offer some insight on my humor. As for the title of this post, it is a play on the lyrics of a song, but we can save that for another day.)

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Polythelia

Random fact of the day: Polythelia is the medical term for the condition of having more than two nipples. Here is the article in Wikipedia for your educational enjoyment.

Monday, January 08, 2007

Start looking for a job 24 Hour Fitness counter boy

So I went to the gym tonight and at the entrance there was a new turnstile and biometric reader (read: fingerprint pad) where there had not been a turnstile or biometric reader before. It turns out that from now on, instead of being welcomed by two or three 24 Hour Fitness employees, I will simply press my thumb down on the pad, type in my phone number -- and presto: access granted.

I am sure many of the muscle endowed counter personnel think this is a wonderful stress-relieving, load-lightening new technology... but the wiser among them can probably see the writing on the wall: start looking for a new job, the day is coming when we will be (as they say in England) made redundant.

It's always sunny in San Diego

Today


Sunny
High
79°F

Precip
0%

Wind: NNE 6 mph
Max. Humidity: 16%
UV Index: 3 Moderate

Sunrise: 6:52 AM PT
Avg. High: 66°F
Record High: 78°F (1983)

Sunday, January 07, 2007

Scouring the internet so you don't have to...

In case you haven't noticed the Interesting Stuff from 'Blogs I Read' box on the left hand side click here for a well put together page (thanks Google) of some of the things I find on the internet and think are the most interesting.

Friday, January 05, 2007

Congratulations!

As some of you may know my brother and sister are graduating from high school this year... the implications of this event are numerous and I probably won't post much about their personal lives. However, a little recognition never hurt anyone. Recently Heather was accepted to the University of Portland and Tyler was informed that he would be receiving a Sequoia Award and scholarship.

I don't know if either of my siblings read my blog, but if they do: I am very proud of and excited for both of you, I am sure this is the beginning of many more great things that will happen this year.

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Pedometer

Many of you may not realize this, but I really like Rice Krispies, made by the good people at Kellogg. This evening, while I was pouring myself a bowl of Krispie goodness, out of the box fell a plastic-wrapped digital pedometer (we have come a long way from secret decoder rings). Along with the pedometer there was the instruction sheet that I have included for you below.

I think that instructions 1-6 are pretty good pointers on the use and opperation of . However, I do think "instruction" 7 is a little odd: "The battery is not replaceable or rechargeable." I must say that if you are going to make something digital, replaceable or rechargeable batteries does not seem like too much to ask for, but I suppose it was free...

"Instructions" 8 and 9 were the ones that really caught me off guard:

"8. Participants take part in exercise at their own risk"
"9. Kellogg's will not be held responsible for any illness or injury that is incurred while using the pedometer"

I know there are some that accuse the populous of the United States of being too litigious, but come on, this is just ridiculous... "Really? I exercise at my own risk?" I almost wonder if the lawyers wrote this line to give people ideas on what they could in fact sue Kellogg for.

As for "instruction" number 9, I understand that if I break my arm while using the pedometer Kellogg does not wish to be held responsible. However, what if the non-replaceable, non-rechargeable battery inside the pedometer blows up on me. I think, in this case, Kellogg should be held responsible for my injury -- no matter what a little piece of white paper says.

Thus, I call "instructions" 8 and 9 bunk. And, sadly, instruction number 4 is probably necessary for many people to figure out how to make their pedometer work.

Monday, January 01, 2007

Coca-Sony

Q: What do Sony and Diet Coke have in common?
A: They are both the topic of this trivial blog post.

Below are a couple things I learned over the holidays that I wanted to share...

The first Sony product was a rice cooker, and as the Sony website states, "tasty rice was a rarity." In fact not only would the cooker under and over cook the rice, but it was also rumored to have spontaneously combusted on some occasions, not unlike some of their more recent products.

My good friend Brandon reported to me last week that the 12 ounce, 20 ounce, and 32 ounce varieties of the popular beverage, Diet Coke list the number of calories to be zero. I also discovered that the 64 ounce size (commonly known as a 2 liter bottle) of Diet Coke lists the caloric content per serving to also be zero. However on a single-serving 42 ounce Diet Coke, the caloric content is listed as 5 calories. This seems to be a an incredible feat of Coke's mathematicians or chemists... for the same Diet Coke that is packaged in a 32 or 64 ounce bottle has zero calories, but in a 42 ounce container it has five calories.

A quick look at Wikipedia and explanation is offered -- FDA guidelines allow any serving containing less than five calories to be listed as calorie free. In actuality all Diet Coke contains calories, probably somewhere around 0.10 calories per ounce. However, because the 64 ounce bottle has multiple servings in it, pursuant to FDA guidelines, they can list it as a zero calorie product. And, single serving sizes smaller than 32 ounces also contain less than 5 total calories, and once again, according to the FDA <5=0. Only the 42 ounce king size Diet Coke tops the calorie scales and must report the horrible truth: even diet soda contains calories.

Y2K7

Happy New Year!

I hope that everyone had a blast this evening wishing 2006 a fond farewell and welcoming 2007 with excitement and expectation... and if you are feeling a little nostalgic for times gone by, don't forget what actually happened in 2006*.

As for me, I am hanging with the family (less one) in Palm Desert, California. Yeah, I decided to forgo some of the crazy parties I was invited to (OK, crazy parties that I am sure I would have been invited to...) to chill with the 'rents and my Bro -- the four of us had a good time. We went and saw The Good Shepherd and then had cheesecake before heading back to the hotel to watch the Waterford Crystal Ball fall on New York (what an odd tradition). And speaking of that tradition, this was the first year that the previously mentioned ball was lit with LEDs as opposed to halogen lights... interesting, huh?

Well whether or not you are into ball lighting technology or not, have a very happy 2007 -- I wish you and all those that are important to you a very special new year.

*may not be safe for work -- probably depends where ya work...